Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1793

reference
987-tree-1
name
1793
tree-preservation-order

undefined

987-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.974207 50.858419)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.974122 50.858410,-0.974125 50.858427,-0.974137 50.858442,-0.974156 50.858454,-0.974179 50.858462,-0.974206 50.858465,-0.974232 50.858462,-0.974256 50.858455,-0.974275 50.858443,-0.974287 50.858428,-0.974292 50.858412,-0.974288 50.858395,-0.974276 50.858380,-0.974258 50.858368,-0.974234 50.858360,-0.974208 50.858357,-0.974182 50.858359,-0.974158 50.858367,-0.974139 50.858379,-0.974126 50.858393,-0.974122 50.858410)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL